Skip to content

All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated.

To view this licence, visit:
https://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3

or write to:
Information Policy Team,
The National Archives,
Kew,
London TW9 4DU

or email: psi@nationalarchives.gov.uk.

This publication is available at:
https://lawcom.gov.uk.

© Crown copyright

Administrative Review

Scrutinising how internal review processes are carried out. This project has not started yet.

The problem (Back to top)

Administrative review allows an individual to challenge a decision about them made by a public body. It is carried out by the public body, at their discretion.

In some cases, requesting a review is a prerequisite to appealing to a tribunal.

Administrative review decisions determine the outcome of at least as many cases as appeals, probably more. Yet have received a fraction of the analysis or academic attention given to other aspects of administrative justice.

Effective internal review procedures reduce the number of appeals and promote confidence in administrative decision-making.

However, recent independent reports have cast doubt on the efficacy of some of the review procedures presently in place.

The project (Back to top)

This project came out of our 13th Programme of Law Reform.

This law reform project will aim to promote correct decisions, cheaper correction mechanisms, and public confidence in decision making.

We will consider and assess the merits of the different procedures that are in place and make recommendations with a view to identifying best practice and generally improving them.

This would include considering the frequency of legal challenge and identifying any items of concern from the point of view of the judiciary and legal practitioners.

Once started it is expected to take between 18-24 months.

Next steps (Back to top)

This project will start as and when resources allow.